<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Telegraph - Latest Comments in Pakistan reviewing all US agreements after Nato air strike </title><link>http://telegraphuk.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://telegraphuk.disqus.com/pakistan_reviewing_all_us_agreements_after_nato_air_strike/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:33:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Pakistan reviewing all US agreements after Nato air strike </title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8935286/Pakistan-reviewing-all-US-agreements-after-Nato-air-strike.html#comment-392626086</link><description>&lt;p&gt;take your head  out of  your  a--, 20 billion what  , you  cant  afford  even 2 dollars  , you  yankee faggots , you forgot  George bush went  witha begging  bowl  to  saudi , kuwait , UAE and china to fund the federal reserve , what is 15 trillions  that you have ask your moma , she will tell you , its debt my son , in 5 years  your  great country is going  to  default , american dream  will end  into  a  wet  dream , and  world  will  see US disintegerate , american civil war is going to consume you , my  little ugly prick , typical gobshite american , Pakistan never  needed  you , you  needed  Pakistan  , go  fight your  war  now alone and with 10 -15 european shitters , we  will see who gets an enema , obama  or  taliban &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kunsha</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:33:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pakistan reviewing all US agreements after Nato air strike </title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8935286/Pakistan-reviewing-all-US-agreements-after-Nato-air-strike.html#comment-384270765</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As an American I agree we should pull out of Pakistan and give them nothing, no money, no weapons, no technology and stealthily limit any new military infrastructure and technology that is allowed into Pakistan. Continue with the constant monitoring and keep a watchful eye should Pakistan make any moves that could be deemed offensive to America or any our allies (India).  Should another superpower or local entity attempt to take over Pakistan and then need the help of America, we simply say you kick us out, sorry cant help you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrethiopianz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 18:14:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pakistan reviewing all US agreements after Nato air strike </title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8935286/Pakistan-reviewing-all-US-agreements-after-Nato-air-strike.html#comment-384242449</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Until Pakistan has reined in its Army, and it's tacit support of the Taliban, it must be treated as a pariah state and receive no aid whatsoever from the west. At least the Iranis are not lying to our faces.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dickberkeley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:02:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pakistan reviewing all US agreements after Nato air strike </title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8935286/Pakistan-reviewing-all-US-agreements-after-Nato-air-strike.html#comment-381333411</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i guess so that we can loot some cash back.  when your forefathers came to the sub continent and looted almost all its nautral resources like GOLD DIAMONDS ETC britian doesnt have anything good except for its exchange rate which is good because of all the reserves it holds when it plundereed the subcontinent.&lt;br&gt;even the weather sucks.and small shity houses if it wasnt for the exchange rate i wouldnt bother even glancing on it in a map.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kamrun</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:26:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pakistan reviewing all US agreements after Nato air strike </title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8935286/Pakistan-reviewing-all-US-agreements-after-Nato-air-strike.html#comment-379683341</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well good for the USA get the facilities ready for a shed load of money, but then again maybe they won't go that far.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">axoz75</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 14:22:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pakistan reviewing all US agreements after Nato air strike </title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8935286/Pakistan-reviewing-all-US-agreements-after-Nato-air-strike.html#comment-379665257</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If Pakistan is so wonderful, why are there a couple of million Pakistanis in Britain?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepurleyking</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:57:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pakistan reviewing all US agreements after Nato air strike </title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8935286/Pakistan-reviewing-all-US-agreements-after-Nato-air-strike.html#comment-379663362</link><description>&lt;p&gt;guiding&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can they take all their aid money when they go?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thepurleyking</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:54:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pakistan reviewing all US agreements after Nato air strike </title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8935286/Pakistan-reviewing-all-US-agreements-after-Nato-air-strike.html#comment-379564072</link><description>&lt;p&gt;what 20 billion????? Pakistan has lost 70 billion on this fake war and 46000 people has died. &lt;br&gt;And what else did Pakistan get? More sanctions and these zionists have ruined our economy. Pakistani Rupee had double value then indian Rupee till 2002. What F16s or drones??? Pakistan is making JF17 (block one can beat older F16s and Block 2 and 3 will easily beat the latest F16s).When you write something don't just look at the western media.. Look at others as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And also think what Pakistan has done for the americans which is far more than what americans has done for us. In fact what americans has done for us??? I don't see any thing .. They blocked every thing for Pakistan by putting sanctions on us and they want help from us and call us allies. I would say go to hell.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guidingstar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 11:13:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pakistan reviewing all US agreements after Nato air strike </title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8935286/Pakistan-reviewing-all-US-agreements-after-Nato-air-strike.html#comment-379532130</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tell the German Foreign Office to push for a positive&lt;br&gt;outcome at Bonn by taking action here:  &lt;a href="http://www.togetherafghanistan.org/bonncampaign/bonntwitter.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.togetherafghanistan.org/bonncampaign/bonntwitter.html"&gt;http://www.togetherafghanis...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And check out the #CommitAtBonn feed from earlier today - experts,&lt;br&gt;Afghan delegates and David Miliband discuss Afghanistan and hopes/fears for the&lt;br&gt;Bonn conference. &lt;br&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PurePMA</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:31:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pakistan reviewing all US agreements after Nato air strike </title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8935286/Pakistan-reviewing-all-US-agreements-after-Nato-air-strike.html#comment-379514650</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pakistan doesn't really need any aid money. In recent years it has become a well known fact that Pakistan is sitting on one of the biggest sweet crude oil reserves in the whole region. Add to that the fact that Pakistan has a massive gold, coal and natural gas reserve and it becomes apparent that one day Pakistan can become the richest country in the South Asian peninsular. Such facts really worry the Indians across the border because it will spell disaster for their aspirations to become a regional power. Pakistan can afford to give the middle finger to the zionists but time will tell.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">amir</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:02:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pakistan reviewing all US agreements after Nato air strike </title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8935286/Pakistan-reviewing-all-US-agreements-after-Nato-air-strike.html#comment-379480237</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I doubt the US can give any money at all its the most debt ridden country and why do you think paksitan has stopped all cooperation 20 billion america is begging money itself barely escaped defaulting on loans it owes. &lt;br&gt;and i bet america has drones for peace thats probably why you think paksitan will use it for peace as well right?why do you think US uilt the drones for peace IRAN just shot one done spying on their soverign territory or wiat i bet obama sent a christmas gift as a peace offering right ? these things are what they are and they are used for what they were made for. and fyi they did get some from china.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kamrun</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:51:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pakistan reviewing all US agreements after Nato air strike </title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8935286/Pakistan-reviewing-all-US-agreements-after-Nato-air-strike.html#comment-379477314</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All will be forgiven if US gives alms of say, $20 billions as 'blood money' and 2 dozens most advanced military aircrafts (more advanced than F16). Also about 50 drones, Pakistan will use them for 'peaceful' purposes. How about this meagre demand US? They are not asking for much, after all they wanted the drones for years now. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dainik</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:44:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pakistan reviewing all US agreements after Nato air strike </title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8935286/Pakistan-reviewing-all-US-agreements-after-Nato-air-strike.html#comment-379476721</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi hope Pakistan stays firm enough is enough so many pakistani's dead for a war thats not ours we were cooperating but look where it got pakistan n who made US the boss i bet if 35000 US CITIZENS had died then the world would have noticed we dont need aid it doesnt help the country (also America hasnt paid more then 800 million) anyways rest were with strings which were against national interest.if america can come so far to see to there national interest well then this is our home so we will look after ours.&lt;br&gt; and your talking about aid according to a swiss official 97 billion dollars are with different swiss banks which belon to corrupt pakistani politicians so if we could stop corruption (like IMRAN KHAN HAS PROMISED) we wouldnt need any aid paksitan is rich in minerals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And if you want to be equal partners well then you can be we DONT NEED YOUR CHARITY DO YOU HONESTLY THINK BY GIVING MONEY YOU CAN ASK ONE COUTRY TO DO ANYTHING.AMERICA WAS  and instructing the PAKISTANI ARMY TO DO OPERATIONS WHICH THEY WANTED SO THEY HAD TO PAY they used our resoureces like our BASES you had to pay. nothing is for free.if you didnt know yes we were allowing you to use our bases and we have only asked to vacate 1 but there are still 2 or at leasr 1 base CHAMAN air base that the US is still using and the most cost effective route to supply nato is through pakistan and we have stopped that why shoudlnt we i bet if 24 US or brit soldiers were killed by pakistani friendly fire or error there would be an uproar.... double standards. IF ITS SUCH AN INCONVIENCE WHY NOT LEAVE PAKISTAN OUT OF THE WAR WHY IS AMERICA SO WORRIED AND CALLING PAKISTANI LEADERS GIVING THIER CONDOLENCES?? AND REGRETTING THAT PAKISTAN SHOULD HAVE COME TO THE BONN CONFERENCE&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;LONG LIVE PAKISTAN WE DONT CARE WHAT THE WORLD THINKS EVERY COUNTRY HAS THE RIGHT TO LOOK OUT FOR THERE OWN NATIONAL INTERESST &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kamrun</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:43:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pakistan reviewing all US agreements after Nato air strike </title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8935286/Pakistan-reviewing-all-US-agreements-after-Nato-air-strike.html#comment-379460581</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wish and hope that Pakistan will connive with extremists and completely be hostile to NATO.It is irony and folly on the part of America and NATO to succumb to the pressure of Pakistan.Pakistan is on the path of self suicide.Pakistan can not survive on its own.The real threat lies in the fact that there is every possibillity of extremists possessind dirty bomb and waiting for time to drop on America.Pakistan and Iran both have become security risk.This is the ripe time to competely isoate Pakistan and declare it terrorist nation,but no one thinking on this aspect&lt;br&gt;chaubey699&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chaubey699</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:10:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pakistan reviewing all US agreements after Nato air strike </title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8935286/Pakistan-reviewing-all-US-agreements-after-Nato-air-strike.html#comment-379437395</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The initial lies perpetrated by (CIA-Pentagon-White House) are coming back to roost. Indian media, as always ready, willing and wanting to portray, India's arch enemy, Pakistan and Pakistan's Secret Services Agency, ISI, grabbed every lie, without as much as bothering to edit them of Americanism, published them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am record smashing this media cabal by posting my usual, sarcastic, acidic, derogatory comments in the Times of India, their cousin, Economic Times, India;s second major media house, Hindustan Times. I got flak from the jingoists. No surprise there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I yelled and screamed of American penchant for little white lies, big black as a chimney soot lies, lies on top of lies, serial lies, editorial lies, as in case of the Rupert Murdoch's yellow rag, The Wall Street Journal news items and their editorials making a case against Alerica's long time friend and ally, Pakistan.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;May Allah be praised, (PBUH)&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Peace.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;...and I am Sid Harth@arabuhuru.org&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sid Harth</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:02:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pakistan reviewing all US agreements after Nato air strike </title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8935286/Pakistan-reviewing-all-US-agreements-after-Nato-air-strike.html#comment-379431971</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does that mean no more charity ( foreign aid ) too? I mean, equals don't have to pay one side to be friends, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maryn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 06:45:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>